HOME

PARTICIPANTS

PROCESSORS

SITES

METRICS

RESULTS

 

The description of the exercise and a summary of the results is available in:

Doxani, G.; Vermote, E.; Roger, J.-C.; Gascon, F.; Adriaensen, S.; Frantz, D.; Hagolle, O.; Hollstein, A.; Kirches, G.;Li, F.; Louis, J.; Mangin, A.; Pahlevan, N.; Pflug, B.; Vanhellemont, Q. "Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise." Remote Sens. 2018,10,352. doi:10.3390/rs10020352

The following table provides the results about the performance of the various participating AC processors in ACIX. The results are grouped by product (AOT, WV and SR) and refer to all the inter-comparison analysis made per site and processor. Plots and statistical information are presented by sensor and vary based on the data processed by each participant.

 

 Aerosol Optical 

Thickness

Plots per test site for all the AC processors (Including the AERONET value)

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Plots per AC processor & site, including cloudy and cloudless cases

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Plots per AC processor for all the test sites

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Tables with the statistics

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Plots per test site for all the AC processors (including the AERONET value)

Sentinel-2

Plots per AC processor &  site, including cloudy and cloudless cases

Sentinel-2

Plots per AC processor for all the test sites  

Sentinel-2

Tables with the results' statistics   

Sentinel-2

Surface 

Reflectance

Time series plots of the estimated SRs of every processor per site and band

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Distance Matrices between the processors per site

Landsat-8
Sentinel-2

Comparison with AERONET corrected data